Argentina

EPO and INPI Argentina sign first Reinforced Partnership Agreement

By José Santacroce, Partner and Head of Patent Department

The European Patent Office and the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) of Argentina are stepping up their cooperation. EPO President Antonio Campino and INPI President Damaso Pardo signed on 2 July 2019 a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to establish a Reinforced Partnership programme between both offices. This comprehensive cooperation agreement is the first of its kind to be set up by the EPO with an IP office in Latin America. The meeting of the Heads of Office took place on the margins of the IP Executive Week in Alicante.

According to Antonio Campinos, thanks to this agreement, the EPO can work more closely with one of the largest economies in Latin America and strengthen its relations with this dynamic region. Building on EPO long-standing ties with INPI, the agreement will help better meet the needs of companies in Argentina and users around the globe.

According to Damaso Pardo, this agreement aims to render the respective patent systems as efficient, user-friendly and reliable as possible for innovators; a robust patent system is an essential instrument for stimulating innovation, entrepreneurship and economic development.

Through their Reinforced Partnership programme, the EPO and …

Utility Model Patent Amendment

By INPI Argentina

Decree 403/2019

DECTO-2019-403-APN-PTE – Decree Nº 260/1996 Amendment.

City of Buenos Aires, 6/5/2019

BY VIRTUE OF File Nº EX-2018-52897206-APN-DO#INPI of Law Nº 27,444 and Decree Nº 260 dated 20 March, 1996, and

WHEREAS:

That by Decree N° 260/96 the Ordered Text of the Law of Patents of Invention and Utility Models  N° 24,481 was approved, with the amendments of Law N° 24,572, as Annex I.

That, likewise, through the above mentioned decree the Regulation of Law Nº 24,481 was approved, with the amendments introduced by Law Nº 24,572, as Annex II.

That, by Law Nº 27,444 of Simplification and Debureaucratization for the Productive Development of Nation, the amendments to the above mentioned rules were introduced.

That in order to guarantee the meeting with the objectives, it is necessary to fit the existing legal framework to the new approaches and requirements, in order to reduce the burdens on the applicants, to shorten the proceeding terms, to urge the debureaucratization in proceedings and the adoption of new management electronic tools.

That in that order, it is proposed to design a creative and innovating proceeding for the protection by the institute of the utility model, emphasizing the celerity thereof …

INPI Resolution No. 123/2019

By INPI Argentina

Moeller IP Advisors kindly informs to clients and friends that on May 27, 2019, the INPI Resolution No. 123/2019 was published, clarifying the recent modifications of our Trademark Law and its regulatory decree.

By this Resolution, the following is determined:  

1. Multiclass applications are not allowed. Trademark applications should be filed indicating only one class of the Nice Classification.
2. The obligation of filing a Declaration of Use falls only upon trademarks and trademark renewals granted as of January 12, 2013.-
3. A grace period of up until January 12, 2020 is stablished to comply with the submission of the Declaration of Use for trademarks and trademark renewals granted between January 12, 2013 and January 12, 2014.- Further information regarding the Declaration of Use may be found
4. Trademark renewal applications may be filed as from 6 months prior to the expiration date and up to 6 additional months from said date.
5. The notification system of our TM Office remains the same until further regulation is issued regarding electronic notifications.
6. Two extension of term of 10 and 5 days is automatically granted to the ordinary 30 days term for replying to an Official Action provided that the corresponding fee is

 Internet Is Free, But Not Free!

By Maria Sol Porro, Trademark Lawyer

Echoes of the New Copyright Directive approved by the European Parliament last month extend to the other side of the pond. That is why, taking advantage of the popularity achieved by the new community copyright reforms for Internet platforms, the Argentine Society of Management of Performing Actors of Argentina (Sagai) announced the launch of a new campaign to demand from them, specifically YouTube, the enforcement of the National Intellectual Property Law.

In this regard, it is important to remark that the aforementioned entity filed a lawsuit with YouTube (whose parent company is Google) 4 years ago for the lack of payment to actors when that platform uploads national series and films (only claim in the world made by a entity of this type). The form of collection to which Sagai aspires is a percentage, regulated by the Argentine Government through the Intellectual Property Law. That is why, according to their representatives, they are very close to the initiative approved in the European Parliament.

As mentioned in another post of this blog1, the new European directive imposes the use of filters to stop the load of content that may have copyright (as …

Argentina INPI – Resolution 112/2019

By José Santacroce, Partner and Head of Patent Department

The Argentine INPI has published on 29 April 2019 Resolution 112/2019 with the objective to accelerate substantive examination of Argentine first filing patent applications.

The text of said resolution is the following:

SEEN the file EX -2019-16551501- -APN-DOINPI, of the Law of Patents of Invention and Utility Models N° 24,481 (t. o. 1996), as amended by laws Nos. 24,572, 25,859 and 27,444, and by the Regulatory Decree N° 260 dated March 20, 1996, Annex II; and

CONSIDERING:

That, today, Argentina is undergoing a transformation and modernization process which aims to an economy growth based on the incorporation of local and world value chains, regarding innovation as the main axis of the productive development.

That, in this frame, the protection of innovations through the system of patents of invention and utility models fulfills a significant role in the competitiveness of firms, especially our PYMES (Small and Medium Sized Companies, from the acronym in Spanish), which invest in innovation and request to protect cash advances and inventions to be afterwards apply to an industrial development.

That this INSTITUTE is adopting several measures, starting with the reform to the proceedings of Patent Law, …

Resolution No. 4/2019: Argentina begins to ¨warm up¨ for the Law of Personal Data

By Maria Sol Porro

As we mentioned in previous articles, compared to the changes in Personal Data that the European Union experienced last year, both at the community level and at the national level, due to the sanction of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDRP), many Latin American countries began to modify their own laws, not only to comply with the regulations in the cases in which the same are applicable to them but also to be in accordance with this wave of modernization and strengthening.

In the specific case of Argentina, a bill was recently presented to Congress that would replace the Personal Data Protection Law No. 25,326, which has been in force since 2000, in an attempt to align the data protection standards of the country with the GDPR. Furthermore, through Resolution 159/2018, published in the Official Gazette dated December 5th, 2018, the modification of the personal data protection authority was arranged, replacing the National Directorate for the Protection of Personal Data by the Agency of Access to Public Information (known as ¨AAIP¨ in Spanish).

It is in this context of continuous changes in data protection in Argentina and while awaiting the treatment in the National Congress of …

Argentine Model Wins Lawsuit over intimate video against Google and Yahoo!

By Maria Sol Porro

Silvina Luna, a well-known Argentine model, obtained a favorable ruling in the second instance in her lawsuit against the search engines Google and Yahoo!, for the broadcast of an intimate video of her with her partner that went viral in 2008.

The lawsuit began when Ms. Luna discovered that the searchers linked her to sites with sexual content, pornography, as a companion and other sex trafficking activities. While first instance had ruled for the search engines, which demonstrated they had promptly complied with a  request to remove in time and form the contents that were reported. The National Chamber of Federal Civil and Commercial Appeals revoked the first ruling, mentioning that some URLs of the search results were not removed in a timely manner.

In this regard, in recent years, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation has held in repeated rulings that the obligation of Internet search engines to de-index or stop displaying content published by third parties must be implemented based on an order that specifies the contents to be removed. The way to identify these contents is, unfailingly, through the specific URL (Uniform Resource Locator, which in Spanish means Uniform Resource Locator).…

Domain names and trade disputes resolution in Argentina

By Moeller IP Advisors

Cybersquatting, the practice of registering domain names using a small variation on a trademark’s name, has been on the rise in South America in the last years. Argentina makes no exception. In the country, registering a ccTLD domain name with the extension .com.ar, .org.ar, .net.ar etc. was free until 2014 – certainly a strong incentive to cybersquatting practices. Indeed, it was common for some users to register a large number of domains trying to resell them to the legitimate trademark owners. It is particularly notable that until 2013, almost the 70% of all domains registered in Argentina were left inactive – probably waiting for someone to pay for them.

The Argentine Legal Framework

Recently, Argentina tried to tackle the issue of cybersquatting through a series of resolutions, of which 3 are particularly worth mentioning.

Resolution 654/2009, enacted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Culture, established the first system of domain name dispute resolution.  Until then, it was only possible to file a claim to a civil court and ask for damages if the party legitimately owned a trademark. The Resolution provided that the trademark owner could file an administrative claim to the NIC, the …

Hotels put the Copyright law of Argentina under pressure

By Maria Sol Porro

As a result of an investigation by the National Commission for the Defense of Competition (CNDC), the Ministry of Commerce fined the Argentine Society of Authors and Composers of Music (Sadaic) for US $ 1,567,945. The survey determined that Sadaic charged “excessive prices” on copyright fees paid by hotels and other establishments for music reproduction in hotels guest rooms.

To determine this fine, the CNDC made an international comparison of the tariffs paid for the reproduction of musical works and the result of the investigation determined that in Argentina hotels and other establishments pay between six and nine times more than the average of the reference countries.

These fees imply a fee payment for copyright for playing music in hotels. With the calculation methodology used by Sadaic, each hotel must pay the fee for having televisions in the rooms, regardless of whether the room was occupied or not and if musical works were even used.

“This measure implies an improvement in the competitiveness of the tourism sector and enables the reduction of tariffs for rights of authors and composers charged for the secondary reproduction of TV and music content in hotels,” according to the president of …

Stay on top of the new Argentine Opposition Proceedings

By Moeller IP Advisors

In July, the Argentine Patent and Trademark Office (INPI) issued the resolution P-183, instituting a new opposition proceeding, which entered in force on September 18, 2018.We are already monitoring it’s implementation and will keep you updated when you send a request to trademarks@moellerip.com.

The innovation of this resolution is based on the fact that it establishes an administrative proceeding to resolve an opposition instead of resorting to the Federal Courts on Civil and Commercial Matters. Additionally, the procedural burden to move forward with the opposition now rests with the opponent instead of on the applicant of the opposed sign.

In general terms, the new opposition proceeding contemplated by the resolution P-183 determines the following:

1) Once the official notification of the opposition is served by the INPI to the parties involved, they will have a three-month period to seek an amicable solution to the conflict.

2) If the three-month negotiation period expires without having reached an agreement, the INPI will notify the opponent in order to obtain a stand on whether or not to open the administrative proceeding to resolve the opposition. If the opponent decides to proceed, they would have to pay a fee of …